Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Omniscience | barczek | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard Last Chance #12761383 |
| Azorius Control | ivc | 5-0 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Last Chance #12761383 |
| Azorius Control | soto_ | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Esper Pixie | mortadela | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Unknown Archetype | geokh1 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Omniscience , 5 Color Legends , Azorius Affinity , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Angels , Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Auras , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Cage
Meta Performance Analysis
Adarkar Wastes ranks #340 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 54.3%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Adarkar Wastes is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 31.92 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.0%. Adarkar Wastes has a win rate of 70.4%, making it 2.1% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thought-Stalker Warlock | Creature — Lizard Warlock | 5 | 96.0% | 4 |
| Glacial Dragonhunt | Sorcery | 11 | 83.3% | 7 |
| Winternight Stories | Sorcery | 14 | 83.1% | 8 |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 11 | 81.9% | 6 |
| Phyrexian Dragon Engine | Artifact Creature — Phyrexian Dragon | 7 | 73.5% | 4 |
| Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 11 | 71.8% | 2 |
| Norn's Inquisitor | Creature — Phyrexian Knight | 5 | 70.0% | 3 |
| Jeskai Revelation | Instant | 17 | 70.0% | 3 |
| Guardian of New Benalia | Creature — Human Soldier | 12 | 69.3% | 6 |
| Knight of Grace | Creature — Human Knight | 73 | 67.0% | 32 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Adarkar Wastes than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 2 | 6 | 88.5% | 68.8% | +19.6% |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 3 | 11 | 82.0% | 72.7% | +9.3% |
| Brotherhood's End | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 75.9% | 67.2% | +8.6% |
| Gix's Command | Sorcery | 5 | 6 | 77.8% | 69.2% | +8.6% |
| Glacial Dragonhunt | Sorcery | 2 | 11 | 81.5% | 74.3% | +7.2% |
| Defabricate | Instant | 2 | 9 | 84.6% | 77.5% | +7.1% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 14 | 79.2% | 72.2% | +7.1% |
| Fear of Missing Out | Enchantment Creature — Nightmare | 2 | 21 | 79.5% | 72.6% | +6.9% |
| Marauding Mako | Creature — Shark Pirate | 1 | 7 | 80.5% | 74.0% | +6.5% |
| Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 1 | 33 | 76.4% | 70.6% | +5.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 1492 | 96.4% | 54.1% |
| Jeskai Convoke | 544 | 98.0% | 48.8% |
| Azorius Tempo | 393 | 98.7% | 42.1% |
| Azorius Omniscience | 324 | 98.2% | 50.0% |
| Azorius Control | 283 | 77.3% | 53.9% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.